Hypha’s toolkit is pretty neat (still in Beta).

Create Your DAO

I might actually use it for whatever I’m building.

Typically people wire together a few tools like Snapshot https://snapshot.org/#/ for voting etc.

(Neighborhoods still in Alpha, only devs can mess around.)

We are looking to use the holocracy structure of the RegenTribe collective in a DAO –

Saw that hypha is now live and going to test it!

Would love to check out this one you’re suggesting :)))

Thanks

Hypha’s DAO/DHO software is ready for free account test-driving… I personally can’t wrap my head around their use of labels re: Archetypes (hahaha took me a while to get used to RegenTribe’s labels, too), prefer more “secularized language”…

My ‘preferred alternative’ to Hypha…

Read more

Also a strongly felt opinon (that no-one asked for but it just obtusely came to mind as ‘somewhat relevant to the topic of DAOs’):

There’s no such thing as ‘flat hierarchy’. Stfu 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤌A hierarchy is a hierarchy of power, value, skill, survival priorities etc.

An organization can have more direct & open lines of communication but WTF is a…

Read more

Imo, DAOs don’t work for everyone/every type of being.

It’s just another way to organize, record, share rewards, compensate etc.

Village tribes also have their own hierarchies or value-system(s), jungle natives have their shamans, etc.

I personally find it somewhat inefficient if there’s too many people involved, can be long-winded (like me,…

Read more

An article from Hypha, which is an org that sets up DAOs for other orgs. This highlights “10 ways that DAOs differ from traditional organizations”.

https://hypha.earth/daoing-it-differently-10-ways-daos-differ-from-traditional-organizations/

Many regenerative projects see DAOs as a great alternative structure for both decision-making and ownership tied to blockchain interactions, but they also require a lot of bureaucratic work and are not generally useful for smaller organizations. What is your opinion?

Holacracy and distributed leadership share some similarities in their focus on distributing authority and decision-making within an organization. However, there are also differences in their approaches. Here’s a comparison of Holacracy and distributed leadership:

1. Organizational Structure: In Holacracy, the organization is structured around…

Read more

Holacracy is a system of organizational governance that aims to distribute authority and decision-making throughout a company or organization. It is designed to replace traditional hierarchical management structures with a more flexible and autonomous approach. Here’s how Holacracy works:

1. Roles and Circles: In Holacracy, the organization…

Read more

Key characteristics of a distributed leadership organization include:

1. Shared Leadership: In a distributed leadership organization, leadership is shared among multiple individuals rather than concentrated in a single person or a small group. It emphasizes the idea that leadership can emerge from anyone within the organization, regardless of…

Read more

what are key charactersitics of a leaderless organization

Key characteristics of leaderless organizations, as highlighted in “The Starfish and the Spider” and similar discussions, include:

1. Decentralization: Leaderless organizations distribute power and decision-making among individuals or smaller groups rather than relying on a…

Read more

“The Starfish and the Spider: The Unstoppable Power of Leaderless Organizations” by Ori Brafman and Rod Beckstrom explores the dynamics and characteristics of decentralized, self-organizing organizations. Here are some deeper details about the book:

1. The Starfish and Spider Analogy: The authors use the starfish and spider as metaphors…

Read more

Oo, so they did actually change their ‘income model’. Sweet. It’s a little TOO much of an organically-grown community software for me.

A couple of months ago, I sent feedback to someone who emailed me about activating a Freemium test account (you probably could, too) about their ecosystem & pricing model being unclear to me & what…

Read more

appreciate your share!

Yes, I see its still evolving. I have been looking into the hypha ecosystem a bit and find it quite interesting. Hypha switched to a stacking model too – you stack a certain amount of coins that come with a number of transactions, when your organization grows and you need more transactions, you stack more Hypha (to…

Read more

For me it’s important not to confuse/conflate the Blockchain (Primary ecosystem), Product (software, features), voting power of the Community & Creators (ie. Secondary/Plurality of Ecosystem(s)).

Technology has no emotions, people do. People can build technology for any reason, based on emotions or not. And my guts say “no” to using it ,🤷

U can see what’s up w existing DAOs here when it’s not ‘under maintenance’ https://dao.hypha.earth

I personally wouldn’t use it – too unstable as a ‘software’ with too high a buy-in price for me (although there’s probably a 1-time fee option… But who makes these decisions with what quorum? Too complicated for me…) Feature-set looks…

Read more

Great list!

Anyone here experienced with the hypha ecosystem?

“organization in a box” http://www.hypha.earth

Very awesome, thanks 👍🙏<div>

I’d only heard of Glassfrog.

For ‘web3’ tools/types of folks there’s

https://snapshot.org/

https://daohaus.club/

& even Hypha (the same people who run SEEDS https://hypha.earth).

</div>

Loomio https://www.loomio.org/ an online platform designed for group decision-making and collaboration. Users can create proposals, discuss them, and vote on decisions in a transparent and inclusive manner.

Decidim https://decidim.org/ a free, open-source platform for participatory democracy that allows users to propose, debate, and vote…

Read more

A compilation of softwares that support alternative governance models in communities and organizations